ANGLAIS
« Some patients with early-stage breast cancer may be able to safely forego full axillary lymph node dissection, reducing their risk of adverse effects. »
A US trial
The results suggest that complete axillary lymph node dissection may no longer be justified in women with one or two positive sentinel nodes and a tumor of 5 cm or smaller. Overall survival was 92.5 % (sentinel node dissection) and 91.8 % (full dissection) at five years.
« Sparing this group of patients full dissection may reduce their risk of developing long-term and later adverse effects, including impaired limb mobility, lymphedema, chronic pain, and neurologic symptoms. »
1- American Journal of Nursing : May 2011 – Volume 111 – Issue 5 – p 15 – Auteur : Karen Rosenberg.
2- The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group ZOO11.
3- Professor Mei Fu of New York University College of Nursing, dans le AJN, May 2011.
To forego (v) Renoncer à
Lymph node (n) ganglion lymphatique
Dissection (n) Ici, ablation ; excision ; curage (d’un ganglion lymphatique)
To randomize (v) Faire au hasard ; d’une façon aléatoire
Lumpectomy (n) Ablation d’une masse, d’une tumeur
To spare (v) Épargner, dispenser, éviter
Adverse effects (adj + n) Effets indésirables
True or false ?
→ All patients had chemotherapy.
F : Adjuvant therapy was at the discretion of the treating physician.
→ Complete axillary dissection is no longer necessary.
F : The words « suggest » and « may » indicate that the study is not conclusive.
→ If patients are spared full dissection, they will have no lymphedema.
F : (Partial) dissection reduces the risk (of adverse effects) but does not eliminate it.